Current:Home > MySupreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case -Mastery Money Tools
Supreme Court refuses to hear bite mark case
View
Date:2025-04-19 13:19:11
MONTGOMERY, Ala. (AP) — The U.S. Supreme Court declined Tuesday to review the case of an Alabama man who has spent decades in prison for a murder conviction supported by recanted and discredited testimony about bite marks.
Charles M. McCrory was convicted of murder for the 1985 killing of his wife, Julie Bonds, who was found beaten to death in her home. Key evidence against him was the testimony of a forensic odontologist who said that two small marks on the victim’s left shoulder matched McCrory’s teeth. The odontologist later said he “fully” recants that 1985 testimony. He wrote in an affidavit that modern science has exposed the limitations of bite mark evidence and that there is no way to positively link the marks to any one person.
Lawyers with the Innocence Project and the Southern Center for Human Rights, which are representing McCrory, had asked the Supreme Court to review an Alabama court’s decision denying his request for a new trial. Justices turned down the petition mostly without comment.
Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in a statement that the case raises “difficult questions about the adequacy of current postconviction remedies to correct a conviction secured by what we now know was faulty science.”
“One in four people exonerated since 1989 were wrongfully convicted based on false or misleading forensic evidence introduced at their trials. Hundreds if not thousands of innocent people may currently be incarcerated despite a modern consensus that the central piece of evidence at their trials lacked any scientific basis,” Sotomayor wrote.
Sotomayor wrote that she voted against reviewing the case because the constitutional question raised by McCrory has not “percolated sufficiently in the lower courts.” But she urged state and federal lawmakers to establish paths for inmates to challenge “wrongful convictions that rest on repudiated forensic testimony.”
The Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals, in rejecting his bid for a new trial, ruled that McCrory had failed to show that result of his 1985 trial “probably would have been different” if the new forensic guidelines regarding bite marks had been used.
The Innocence Project says that least 36 people have been wrongfully convicted through the use of bite mark evidence. A Florida man was freed in 2020 after spending 37 years in a Florida prison for a 1983 rape and murder he did not commit. The conviction was based partly on faulty bite mark analysis.
Bonds was found beaten to death May 31, 1985, in the home she shared with her toddler son. The couple were divorcing and lived separately at the time. McCrory has maintained his innocence. He told police that he had been at the home the night before to do laundry and say goodnight to his son. His attorneys argued that there was no physical evidence linking McCrory to the crime and that hair found clutched in the decedent’s hand did not belong to McCrory.
Bonds’ family, who believed McCrory was responsible, hired private prosecutors for the case against McCrory. They hired Florida forensic dentist Dr. Richard Souviron, who gained fame as an expert after testifying in the trial of serial killer Ted Bundy. McCrory was convicted and sentenced to life in prison.
Souviron later recanted his testimony. McCrory’s attorneys said two other forensic experts disputed that the marks were bite marks at all.
McCrory’s attorneys wrote in their petition that that the current district attorney had offered to resentence Mr. McCrory to time served, which would allow him to immediately leave prison, in exchange for a guilty plea.
“Mr. McCrory declined, unwilling to admit to a crime he did not commit,” his attorneys wrote.
McCrory was denied parole in 2023. He will be eligible again in 2028.
veryGood! (62)
Related
- IRS recovers $4.7 billion in back taxes and braces for cuts with Trump and GOP in power
- Selling Sunset Reveals What Harry Styles Left Behind in His Hollywood House
- On Father's Day Jim Gaffigan ponders the peculiar lives of childless men
- How law enforcement is promoting a troubling documentary about 'sextortion'
- Trump suggestion that Egypt, Jordan absorb Palestinians from Gaza draws rejections, confusion
- Solar Industry to Make Pleas to Save Key Federal Subsidy as It Slips Away
- Sickle cell patient's success with gene editing raises hopes and questions
- This Week in Clean Economy: GOP Seizes on Solyndra as an Election Issue
- 'Survivor' 47 finale, part one recap: 2 players were sent home. Who's left in the game?
- Is Teresa Giudice Leaving Real Housewives of New Jersey Over Melissa Gorga Drama? She Says...
Ranking
- Skins Game to make return to Thanksgiving week with a modern look
- Global Warming Pushes Microbes into Damaging Climate Feedback Loops
- Blinken arrives in Beijing amid major diplomatic tensions with China
- Judge Orders Dakota Access Pipeline Review, Citing Environmental Justice
- Mets have visions of grandeur, and a dynasty, with Juan Soto as major catalyst
- You'll Be Crazy in Love With Beyoncé and Jay-Z's London Photo Diary
- The U.S. has a high rate of preterm births, and abortion bans could make that worse
- Federal judge in Texas hears case that could force a major abortion pill off market
Recommendation
The Super Bowl could end in a 'three
Salman Rushdie Makes First Onstage Appearance Since Stabbing Attack
Save 80% On Kate Spade Crossbody Bags: Shop These Under $100 Picks Before They Sell Out
Q&A: 50 Years Ago, a Young Mother’s Book Helped Start an Environmental Revolution
Former Syrian official arrested in California who oversaw prison charged with torture
Save 80% On Kate Spade Crossbody Bags: Shop These Under $100 Picks Before They Sell Out
Blinken arrives in Beijing amid major diplomatic tensions with China
Bear kills Arizona man in highly uncommon attack